It’s becoming more clear every day that Conrad Burns has been around the “stockyards” in D.C. so long that only the folks back home can smell the “you-know-what.”
Janet Hook of the LA Times recently paid a visit to Montana to talk to Montanans about this year’s U.S. Senate race. What she found points to “signs of trouble for the GOP”. Voters are fed up with Conrad Burns’ dealings with disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, and they’re not afraid to say it:
“These people need to pay more attention to the money they are taking,” said Bill Curry, a brick mason from Belgrade, a town northwest of Bozeman. “It’s corrupt. I don’t like it. It’s not good.”
Earlier in the story, a former supporter of Conrad Burns explains why he’s not with the Senator this year in November:
Jack Bolender, a retiree who voted for three-term Sen. Conrad Burns because the Republican delivered mounds of federal aid to Montana, said he was deserting the incumbent in the state’s November election. Allegations that Burns was cozy with Jack Abramoff, the lobbyist central to a wide-ranging corruption scandal in Washington, have Bolender steamed.
“I appreciate what [Burns] brought to the state, but at what cost?” Bolender said one cold afternoon outside Murdoch’s. “We seem to be selling out to the special interests.”
It’s funny that the only retort Republicans can put together throughout the article is to accuse Democrats of mudslinging. Unfortunately for them, Democrats like Jon Tester have been clear on the issues, promising to fight and win for Montana on issues like health care, energy, and jobs.
This story should be news to Burns that it’s tough to call Democratic ads about ethics dirty when you’re stuck in a muddy scandal with Jack Abramoff. Montana voters are smarter than that.